Essay on Mircea Eliade's Rites and Symbols of Initiation

In Rites and Symbols of Initiation, Mircea Eliade begins his investigation into initiatory practices with a survey of the world’s archaic cultures and a common shamanic religious foundation, specifically the importance of ritualistic death and rebirth. Eliade argues that all initiation rites involve in some way the death/rebirth symbolism. This essay will attempt to understand the significance of initiatory death and rebirth and then examine the initiatory rites of various ancient cults with respect to death and rebirth.


According to Eliade, the myth of archaic societies primarily concerns the origins of things and human events. History is a sacred narrative involving the actions and manifestations of the invisible realm of the supernatural, of which this world, its inhabitants and institutions are a reflection. Whereas modernity places the human within the traction of a specifically human narrative culminating in the present and undoubtedly continuing into the human future, the archaic myth posits the supreme importance of first action which itself is a transhuman occurrence and worthy because of its originary creative power. Initiation is the event that transmits this sacred knowledge to eligible members of the society, and attempts to at best recreate through human imitation tried-and-true transhuman creative gestures.


Symbolic repetition of the primordial creative event serves then as a kind of maintaining of the world order. But implicit in Eliade’s argument of primordial creative repetition is the concept of cyclical time and the archaic understanding of origin. The archaic cultures’ relationship to time lacked a sense of modern historic memory and operated under the assumption of a fixed first cause worthy of repetition. On the other hand, the very act of repetition also seems to continually inaugurate origin in the present and allows for continued unfixed activity. Origin then, is not something present but something that must be made present by way of human intervention. Thus the archaic act of restoration to origin is highly sacred and peculiar to each culture and perhaps definitive to the notion of culture itself. The act must also admit the necessity of abandonment of the current state of affairs in order for the culture to continue successfully or even to promote growth. Such abandonment requires destruction and a return to origin, or a death and a rebirth. Death then is not a permanent ending or an uncertainty, but rather a temporary and required cyclical function of maintenance. Only out of a willing and perilous return to chaos that promises latent creativity can an effective origin be reborn.

Eliade defines three categories of initiation rite in the archaic cultures: collective rites including puberty initiations; secret rites involving exclusive membership; vocational rites including shamanic induction. With collective initiation rites, the assumption is that the individual is not entirely human until completion of the initiation, at which time the revelation of what the collective considers its entire sacred narrative is presented to the initiate. Many of these rites include the taking of the child away from the mother, often under cover of darkness and into a sacred space that may be enclosed and deemed holy. During the rite, the child is told he may in fact face death at the hands of terrible supernatural forces, and the leaders of the initiation may actually present elaborate scenes and depictions of death. The risk of death seems quite literal and may involve being swallowed, eaten, or dismembered by the angry deity. The initiate may lose a part of the body such as a tooth, undergo ritualistic body modification, or be told that through magical extraction something inside the body must be taken out. Other activities may include a kind of deprivation of sleep, food, or normal daily activity, which promotes a sense of death to the collective. In all instances, death is the motif and the dying represents a dying to childhood and awakening to adulthood. As the symbolic death is carried out at the hands of the supernatural entities, the mythic stories are again played out and the opportunity for rebirth as a new human is presented to the children as both an individual rite of passage and a collective regeneration of the cosmos.

In the secret and shamanic rites, the idea of entering into the embryonic state in order to connect to the divine is played out the rites of initiation. This return may include a knowing and willful descent into the dangerous realm of the dead. In shamanic rites in particular, the motif of physical dismemberment repeats throughout various cultures and indeed resurfaces in the myths at the center of the various mystery cults. Of note is the shamanic ordeal of the Siberian Avam-Samoyed, and the apparent cutting up of the body and the beheading of the initiate, the cooking of the bones, and the dispersal of the remains into a river, in which we find specific parallels to the mythic story of Orpheus’ death and rebirth (these activities are experienced in a non-ordinary state of consciousness). These kinds of suffering allow for a journey of the initiate to the sacred realms and a communing with the divinities. Upon return, the shaman brings the powers of collective and individual healing and the promise of transforming the material body into a spiritualized mode of being unlike the everyday ways of existing. Eliade suggests that the cultural prevalence of shamanic death and rebirth motif in the archaic world greatly influenced many of the ancient cultures and their mystery traditions.


The motif of death and rebirth can be found in the mythic origination stories concerning the mystery cults. With the Eleusinian mysteries we have the story of Demeter descending to Hades to find Persephone. With Orpheus we find his descent to the underworld seeking Eurydice. Attis, the lover of the great mother goddess Cybele, castrates himself and dies to be born again as a pine tree, while, according to Plutarch, the foundational Egyptian myth of Isis and Osiris involves the killing of Osiris (brother and husband to Isis), his dismemberment and scattering into the Nile, and his subsequent rebirth owing to Isis. One can also investigate the known evidence concerning cults themselves, such as the caverns employed by the Mithraic mysteries, as well as investigate the state of culture in general as it relates to the archaic purpose of initiation, which is the revelation of the sacred narrative of the human and culture in relation to the divine. In these initiation cults, we can find the focus of relieving the individual of the collective fear of death by voluntary exploration. This essay will briefly discuss these concerns.

The cult of Demeter conducted the secret initiations for about 2000 years at Eleusis, hence the term Eleusinian mysteries. While the cult originated locally and allegedly at the behest of the goddess herself (indicative of an early inception), it spread in prominence across Hellenic antiquity and was eventually subsumed by the Roman Empire. As the cult enjoyed a kind of institutional status amongst the Athenians, parts of the initiation were performed publicly as the lesser initiations while the greater mysteries remain tightly guarded to the point where the state actually punished those who even threatened to reveal its secrets. The cult employed a priestly structure to conduct the rites, with various specific roles including heirophant or high priest as well as the sponsor for the initiate who was always initiated individually. The rites included various stages of initiation, which involved purification, revelation, and transmission of the sacred mystery resulting in a newly emerged world view most often associated with an astounding light. Initiates drank from a sacred vessel, followed by a secret rite within the enclosed sanctuary. While the specifics of the rites are unknown, Aristotle described the event as not imparting any kind of intellectual knowing in the initiate but rather an overall emotional and psychic experience resulting in a revelatory wonder. One description from an ancient essay “On the Soul,” by Themistios states the experience is like death, resulting in a wandering in the dark and an encounter with terror until “one is struck with a marvelous light,” and profoundly differentiated in divine communion and happiness from the uninitiated. Demeter’s journey to the underworld is a central component of the cult’s sacred narrative, and as such the cult may well have understood the final revelatory initiation as a kind of journey into Hades required to obtain divine communion.


While the Eleusinian mysteries imparted a sense of divine communion upon the living initiate, the cult of Orpheus spread the doctrine of reincarnation, which was uncharacteristic for Hellenic culture. One can see the relation to death as a kind of temporary state to be passed through similar to the archaic initiatory rites and even in the Pharoic belief of reincarnation as introduced by Osiris, though with Orphism the promise of the soul’s continuation extends to all initiates and not just the Pharaoh. Evidence of the influence of Orphic initiation is found in Plato’s Phaedrus. Plato could reasonably have been an initiate into the Orphic mysteries, and indeed his writing speaks repeatedly of initiation and mysteries. One passage mentions the results of initiation into mysteries, speaking of blissful spectacles of revelation and of pure light that reveals the soul’s encased condition within the body. According the Orphic origination myth, the human is born from the smoke of the destruction of the Titans. The Titans, having previously dismembered and eaten Zeus’ son Dionysius, are blasted by Zeus’ thunderbolt. The components of the smoke include then the Titanic and the hidden trace of Dionysius. From this myth, the Orphics and especially Plato could have related the understanding of the human as composed of both material body and soul, and, as with other initiatory cults, the element of shamanic dismemberment and rebirth is again a key component of the sacred narrative.


The Isis cult as found in the Hellenic period understood Isis as the culmination of the various mother goddesses of antiquity in one persona. In the Egyptian cult of Osiris, the lover of Isis and like the other deities in the mystery cults, is a god whom endures dismemberment and the descent into the underworld to be reborn and who offers similar redemption to the initiates. In Hellenic worship, the initiation was extended to all individuals and not solely to the Pharaoh, and by the time of the writing of the Golden Ass, had assumed a popularity and cultural institution similar to the Eleusinian mysteries of ancient Greece. Apuleius’ account of the initiation rites (the only known account of its kind) speaks of a personal vision of the Goddess revealed to the protagonist that precedes the initiation, again relating the individual nature of the mysteries. The public portion of the rite is described in detail, and as for the secret ceremony, Apuleius does not speak directly for fear of revealing the great secrets, but does emphatically state that the process included approaching the boundaries of death and a ravishing, followed by a divine light and a vision of the gods. Lucius speaks of being reborn, and indeed the point of initiation in the context of the novel occurs at the instance of Lucius being transformed from beast to human. Lucius is also promised a vision of the divine light of the goddess after his own death, which again points to a conception of rebirth as both a living human into a new kind of initiated condition and as a promise of a continuation of the soul after death.

Within the cult of Cybele and Attis, the ritualistic slaying of a bull over an enclosed pit was practiced. The high priest descended into the pit to receive the blood of the bull and covered in gore ascends to the surface to be greeted and worshiped by the crowd. The priestly class of the cult included among others the galli; a sect of voluntarily castrated male devotees. In both instances can be seen similarities to the archaic concerns of brutally enacting death as well as mutilation in the service of differentiation from non-devotees. In the sacred myth of Attis, his death is central to the narrative. While he is not necessarily reborn as human, his death induces a Demeter-like searching and roaming on the part of Cybele for her lover. Regardless, the ceremonial mourning of Attis represents the kind of ritual found in the archaic initiation rites in its intent to recreate the necessary return to the chaos in order to bring about the originary creative activity. The latter initiatory rites of Attis include accounts of entrance into a cave or enclosed space, the journey to Hades and the return of the initiate after the voluntary death.


The Mithraic mysteries gained prominence in Roman antiquity, and also included initiation ceremonies held within sacred dark spaces. Much of what is known of the cult is found solely in the remaining temples, which indicate a space that valued secrecy and darkness. Various accounts of the initiation describe the experience as a rebirth and ascent to the divine realm, and like other rites such as the Eleusinian mysteries employed degrees or stages of initiation. Inscriptions in Mithraic ruins, specifically at Santa Prisca in Rome, contain eighteen lines of hymns, including the verse “him who is piously reborn and created by sweet things.”

In each of the mystery cults examined, the individual seems to endure a kind of cosmological re-alignment. This re-alignment is personified by the various deities and manifested in a vision of the heavens. The result of this cosmological re-alignment is a new understanding of the condition of the human. The uninitiated are viewed by the initiated as scared, unsure, and lost owing to a profound fear of death. In each instance, the mystery cults reveal a light that is only revealed after crossing the threshold of death in a way that is ritualistic but thoroughly believable and quite possibly genuinely perilous. In the case of the archaic cults, the re-alignment results in a communion with originary supernatural powers as a means of both understanding the human’s relation to the cosmos as well as the sacred justification for the re-enactment of originary creative forces for the sake of cultural maintenance. In the latter mystery cults, the same methods and result—cosmological re-orientation—of the archaic initiation rites are found, yet the re-alignment seemingly assures not only continued maintenance of the culture but now extends specifically to the individual’s own relation to the cosmos outside of the collective. The introduction of the disembodied soul or psyche is now the medium by which the human identifies with the cosmos, as each of the mystery cults speak of the flight of the soul to heavens. Cosmology then appears intimately bound up with the psyche, and the revelation of one spurs profound insight into the other. When Plato writes of the universe being bound by psyche, we can then understand that the limits of both cosmos and psyche are bound precisely at a threshold, and the threshold in each of these mystery cults that ultimately needs to be crossed in order to achieve revelation is death, with the promise of not annihilation but rebirth as the divinely communing human.

Demons

Sacred Magic

The aim of sacred magic, as we have said, is represented by the shield that the Empress holds in place of the book which the High Priestess holds. 
Sacred gnosis has as its aim the communicable expression (or "book") of mystical revelation, whilst the aim of sacred magic is liberating action, i.e. the restoration of freedom to beings who have partially or totally lost it. The eagle in flight depicted on the shield signifies this emblem of sacred magic, which could thus be formulated: "Give freedom to he who is enslaved." And this includes all the works mentioned by Luke:
Jesus cured many of diseases and plagues and evil spirits, and on many that were blind he bestowed sight. And he answered them: Go and tell John what you have seen and heard: the blind receive their sight, the lame walk, lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, the poor have good news preached to them. (Luke vii, 21-22) 
This is the aim of sacred magic; it is nothing other than to give the freedom to see, to hear, to walk, to live, to follow an ideal and to be truly oneself —  i.e. to give sight to the blind, hearing to the deaf, the ability to walk to the lame, life to the dead, good news or ideals to the poor and free will to those who are possessed by evil spirits. It never encroaches upon freedom, the restoration of which is its unique aim.
It is more than pure and simple healing which is the object of sacred magic; it is the restoration of freedom, including here freeing from the imprisonment of doubt, fear, hate, apathy and despair.
The "evil spirits" which deprive man of his freedom are not at all beings of the so-called "hierarchies of evil" or "fallen hierarchies". Neither Satan, nor Belial, nor Lucifer, nor Mephistopheles have ever deprived anyone of his freedom.
Temptation is their only weapon and this presupposes the freedom of he who is tempted. But possession by an "evil spirit" has nothing to do with temptation. It is invariably the same thing as with Frankenstein's monster. One engenders an elemental being and one subsequently becomes the slave of one's own creation.
The "demons" or "evil spirits" of the New Testament are called today in psychotherapy "neuroses of obsession", "neuroses or fear", "fixed ideas", etc. They have been discovered by contemporary psychiatrists and are recognized as real — i.e. as "parasitic psychic organisms" independent of the conscious human will and tending to subjugate it.
But the devil is not there to no avail — although not in the sense of direct participation. He observes the law — which protects human freedom and is the inviolable convention between the hierarchies of the "right" and those of the "left" — and never violates it, as stands out in the example of the story of Job.
One need not fear the devil, but rather the perverse tendencies in oneself!
For these perverse human tendencies can deprive us of our freedom and enslave us.
Worse still, they can avail themselves of our imagination and inventive faculties and lead us to creations which can become the scourge of mankind. The atomic bomb and the hydrogen bomb are flagrant examples of this.
Man with the possible perversity of his warped imagination is far more dangerous than the devil and his legions.
For man is not bound by the convention concluded between heaven and hell;
he can go beyond the limits of the law and engender arbitrarily malicious forces whose nature and action are beyond the framework of the law...
such being the Molochs and other "gods" of Canaan, Phoenicia, Carthage, ancient Mexico
and other lands, which exacted human sacrifice.
One has to guard against accusing the beings of the hierarchies of evil to their detriment of having played the role of Molochs, these being only creatures of the perverse collective human will and imagination.
These are egregores, engendered by collective perversity, just as there exist the "demons" or "evil spirits" engendered by individuals.
But we have said enough about demons; the problem of "evil spirits" will be treated in a more detailed and profound way in the fifteenth Letter, dedicated to Arcanum XV.

The Devil

The theme of the fifteenth Arcanum of the Tarot is one of the generation of demons and of the power that they have over those who generate them. It is the Arcanum of the creation of artificial beings and of the slavery into which the creator can fall —becoming a slave of his own creation.
In order to be able to grasp this Arcanum, it is necessary firstly to take account of the fact that the world of evil consists not only of fallen entities of the celestial hierarchies (with the exception of Seraphim)
but also of entities of non-hierarchical origin,
i.e. entities who, in the manner of bacilli, microbes and viruses of infectious diseases in the domain of biology, owe their origin — to express it in the terms of Scholastic philosophy — neither to the primary cause, nor to secondary causes, but rather to tertiary causes, namely to arbitrary abuse on the part of autonomous creatures.
Thus, there are hierarchies who are "of the left" and who act within the framework of the law, executing a strictly just function in their capacity as accusers and "putters to the trial" — whilst on the other hand there are "microbes of evil" or entities artificially created by incarnated human beings.
These latter entities are demons whose soul is a special passion and whose body is the totality of "electromagnetic" vibrations produced by this passion.
These artificial demons can be engendered by human communities — such are many of the monstrous "gods" of the Phoenicians, Mexicans, and even Tibetans of the present day.
The Canaan Moloch who demanded the bloody sacrifice of the first born, mentioned so often in the Bible, is not a hierarchical entity — either of good or of evil  — but rather an evil egregore, i.e. a demon created artificially and collectively by human communities infatuated with the thrill of fear. The Mexican Quetzalcoatl is a similar instance of this. There, also, it was a matter of a demon created and worshiped collectively.
With respect to Tibet, we find there the singular phenomenon of the conscious — semi-"scientific"— practice of the creation and destruction of demons. It appears that in Tibet the Arcanum with which we are occupied is known, and it is practiced as one of the methods of occult training of the will and imagination. The training consists of three parts: the creation of tulpas (magical creatures) through concentrated and directed imagination, then their evocation and, lastly, the freeing of consciousness from their hold on it by an act of knowledge which destroys them — through which it is realized that they are only a creation of the imagination, and therefore illusory.
The aim of this training is therefore to arrive at disbelief in demons after having created them through the force of imagination and having confronted their terrifying apparitions with intrepidity. This is what Alexandra David-Neel, who wrote with a deep knowledge of the subject, said about it:
I have questioned several lamas on this subject (of incredulity). "Incredulity comes sometimes," answered a geshes (graduate) from Derge (a town in Kham, Eastern Tibet). "Indeed, it is one of the ultimate objects of the mystic masters, but if the disciple reaches this state of mind before the proper time he misses something which these exercises are designed to develop, that is fearlessness. Moreover, the teachers do not approve of simple incredulity, they deem it contrary to truth. The disciple must understand that gods and demons do really exist for those who believe in their existence, and that they are possessed with the power of benefiting or harming those who worship or fear them. However, very few reach incredulity in the early part of their training. Most novices actually see frightful apparitions... I had the opportunity of talking with a gomchen of Ga (Eastern Tibet) called Kushog Wanchen about sudden deaths which occurred while calling up demons. This lama did not appear inclined towards superstition and I thought he would agree with my opinion on this matter. "Those who died were killed by fear. Their visions were the creations of their own imagination. He who does not believe in demons would never be killed by them." I was much astonished when the anchorites replied in a peculiar tone of voice: "According to that it must also follow that a man who does not believe in the existence of tigers may feel confident that none of them would ever hurt him even if he were confronted by such a beast.". . . and he continued: "Visualizing mental formations, either voluntarily or not, is a most mysterious process. What becomes of these creations? May it not be that like children born of our flesh, these children of our mind separate their lives from ours, escape our control, and play parts of their own? Must we not also consider that we are not the only ones capable of creating such formations? And if such entities (tulpas, magical creatures) exist in the world, are we not liable to come into touch with them, either by the will of their maker or from some other cause? Could one of these causes not be that, through our mind or through our material deeds, we bring about the conditions in which these entities are capable of manifesting some kind of activity?. . .One must know how to protect oneself against the tigers to which one has given birth, as well as against those that have been begotten by others." (Alexandra David-Neel, Magic and Mystery in Tibet, London, 1967, pp. 146-148) "
The art and method of "making idols", which is forbidden by the second of the ten commandments, is ancient and universal. It seems that at all times and everywhere demons have been engendered.
Both Eliphas Levi and the Tibetan masters are in agreement not only with respect to the subjective and psychological origin of demons but also with respect to their objective existence. Engendered subjectively, they become forces independent of the subjective consciousness which engendered them.
They are, in other words, magical creations, for magic is the objectification of that which takes its origin in subjective consciousness.
Demons that have not arrived at the stage of objectification, i.e. at that of an existence separate from the psychic life of their parents, have a semi-autonomous existence which is designated in modern psychology by the term "psychological complex".
C. G.Jung regarded these as parasitic entities, which are to the psychic organism what, for example, cancer is to the physical organism.
A psychopathological "complex" is therefore a demon, when it has not come from outside but is engendered by the patient himself.
In its state of gestation it is still not born, but it certainly has an almost autonomous life of its own, nourished by the psychic life of its parent. C. G. Jung said on this subject:
It appears as an autonomous formation intruding upon consciousness. . . It is just as if the complex were an autonomous being capable of interfering with the intentions of the ego. Complexes do indeed behave like secondary or partial personalities possessing a mental life of their own. (C. G.Jung, Psychology and Religion; trsl. R. F. C. Hull, The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, vol. 11, London, 1958, pp. 13-14) 
Now, "an autonomous being capable of interfering with the intentions of the ego" and which "possesses a mental life of its own" is nothing other than what we understand by a "demon".
How are demons engendered? As with all generation, that of demons is the result of the cooperation of the male principle and the female principle, i.e. the will and the imagination, in the case of generation through the psychic life of an individual. A desire that is perverse or contrary to nature, followed by the corresponding imagination, together constitute the act of generation of a demon.
With respect to generation effected collectively, the demon — which in this case is known by the term egregore — is likewise the product of will and imagination, which in this case are collective. The birth of such an egregore in modern times is known to us:

"A spectre is haunting Europe —the spectre of communism"—such is the first phrase of the Communist Manifesto of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels of 1848. The Communist Manifesto continues:
"All the powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance to exorcise this spectre: Pope and Czar. Metternich and Guizot, French radicals and German police-spies." (Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Manifesto of the Communist Party; trsl. S. Moore, London, 1932, p. 8) 
What I am saying here concerning the generation of the most imposing modern egregore is in perfect accord with Marxist teaching itself. Because for Marxism there is no God or gods — there are only "demons" in the sense of creations of the human will and imagination.
This is the fundamental Marxist doctrine of the so-called "ideological superstructure". According to this doctrine it is the economic interest, i.e. the will, which creates, i.e. imagines, ideologies — religious, philosophical, social and political.
For Marxism all religions are, therefore, only such "ideological superstructures", i.e. formations due to the human will and imagination.
Marxism-Leninism itself is only an ideological superstructure, a product of intellectual imagination, on the basis of the will having arranged — or re-arranged — social, political and cultural things in a certain manner.
And this method of production of ideological superstructures on the basis of the will is precisely what we understand by the collective generation of a demon or egregore.
We who have had experience of the demon or egregore in question above, and of the demon engendered by a collective will infatuated with national ambitions and making use of an imagination drawn from the province of biology — the national-socialist demon or egregore — know from first-hand experience what terrible power resides in our will and imagination, and what responsibility it entails for those who unleash it into the world!
How true it is that he who "sows the wind, shall reap the whirlwind" (Hosea ix, 7)... and what a whirlwind!
We people of the twentieth century know that the "great pests" of our time are the egregores of "ideological superstructures", which have cost humanity more life and suffering than the great epidemics of the Middle Ages.
And having this knowledge, is it not time that we said to ourselves: let us be silent. Let us make our arbitrary will and imagination silent; let us impose on them the discipline of silence. Is this not one of the four traditional rules of Hermeticism: to dare, to will, to know, to be silent? To be silent is more than to keep things secret; it is more even than to guard oneself from profaning the holy things to which a respectful silence is owed. To be silent is, above all, the great magical commandment of not engendering demons through our arbitrary will and imagination; it is the task of silencing arbitrary will and imagination.

-- text from Meditations on the Tarot by Anonymous